Business intent
Listen to the business, clarify the user outcome, surface constraints, and grill ambiguous language before choosing a technical path.
- Business intent
- Stakeholder context
- Grilling
- Outcome definition
Architecture
AI-native product engineering is a disciplined lifecycle: agents execute meaningful work across every stage while I retain product judgment, accountability, and release authority.
Bilingual site, cases, services, and accessible interaction
Astro · EN / ESPublishing, ownership, and shared content contracts
Content Graph · ConvexPublished images, versioned fallbacks, and fast delivery
CloudflareRequests, analytics, and errors with explicit boundaries
Form · PostHogPreview, checks, promotion, and production smoke
develop → mainThe sequence makes decisions, dependencies, verification, and release boundaries visible. AOHYS is one public implementation of this practice—not the limit of the architecture or a map of the private Development System.
Listen to the business, clarify the user outcome, surface constraints, and grill ambiguous language before choosing a technical path.
Model the domain, name stable concepts, compare tradeoffs, and record the decisions that shape the product and system.
Turn the agreed direction into specs, executable tickets, ownership, acceptance seams, and dependencies that preserve the right order.
Specialized agents research, implement, test, and review bounded work. The human orchestrator integrates evidence and resolves the decisions tools cannot own.
Use proportional TDD, linting, type checks, behavior tests, independent review, and browser QA to verify the real user-visible result.
Build a Preview Deployment, collect human review, promote through the Release Train, verify the Production Deployment, and run smoke checks.
Agents can expand execution capacity, but they cannot own business intent, risk acceptance, or release authority.
The lifecycle should be inspectable without exposing private instructions, operating methods, or delivery details.
A green build does not prove that a release works in its real environment.
The seams that keep the topology connected.
Agents execute requirements work, modeling, specs, tickets, implementation, tests, review, and QA. Alejandro retains product judgment, integrates the evidence, and authorizes release.
The Public Source Site makes AOHYS implementation choices inspectable. Private Work—including client code, data, operational screens, credentials, and the Development System—remains private.
A Preview Deployment is built and reviewed first. Production moves through a separate promotion with explicit authority, environment checks, deployment verification, and smoke checks on the canonical domain.
AOHYS demonstrates localized public routes, authenticated private workflows, typed content, observability, and a protected release path. It is one concrete example of the broader professional architecture.
The Development System coordinates tools and agents across different coding environments. It is private, not open source or a commercial template, and every team should adapt its own practice.
Observability, analytics, errors, smoke checks, and stakeholder feedback return real behavior to the next product decision instead of treating release as the end of the lifecycle.
Tell me what you are building, who it should serve, and what is getting in the way. I will read the context myself and reply with useful questions and a practical next step.